Wikipedia:Landsbybrønden/Gesta Wulinensis

Gesta Wulinensis

Hej. Jag skriver detta inlägg på engelska, då jag inte vet hur bra alla på dawp förstår svenska. Era svar får dock gärna vara på danska, då jag förstår det och ibland även jobbar i ert vackra land.

My concerns is about sv:Gesta Wulinensis, which is a script that is said to be from the middle ages. There is no article on Dawp, but on Svwp about it (as linked above). There is an academic discussion about this script and the so called Haraldsguldet. Are they genuine? The finder, archeologist Sven Rosborn says so, but as you see in source 7, in Haraldsguldet, this is disputed by Videnskab.dk, and also in Swedish archeology forum (read it and the Wikipedia critice). I was told this script is used on Wikipedia some week ago on facebook by a museum worker at Odense museum, and told her this is not good. What I found when doing a search on the Nordic languages dawp had used this in most articles, even as a source (19 hits). While this is a very controversal script (even if Rosborn is an excelent archeolog) and its genuinity is not a good thing to use it like that. I am therefor going to erase this source, and the fact that uses that as a source. It is important that Wikipedia stands on credible sources and do not use disputed once, and it is a pity that the danish museum workers and archeologists do not trust Wikipedia because of this disputed source. I hope this is ok, but I wanted to explain it here first. If you answer, please ping me, because I am not so very active on dawp. Adville (diskussion) 11. maj 2024, 22:06 (CEST)

@Adville: Artiklen er slettet. Læs mere her: Diskussion:Gesta_Wulinensis_ecclesiae_pontificum. --Madglad (diskussion) 11. maj 2024, 23:39 (CEST)

Thanks. Yes, it is slettet, but still used as a source in 19+ articles. (I am on the last one now, I think, and deletes it and what I see are directly from that source. Adville (diskussion) 11. maj 2024, 23:44 (CEST)

I have now slettet all places where I saw that specific source. Nothing else from Rosborn, as he has a good reputation. Best regards Adville (diskussion) 12. maj 2024, 00:32 (CEST)

@Adville, du skal have mange tak, både for arbejdet med de konkrete kilder og med din omhyggelige redegørelse for problemstillingen. Mvh. Økonom (diskussion) 12. maj 2024, 09:26 (CEST)

Tak så mycket. Adville (diskussion) 12. maj 2024, 12:46 (CEST)

Bäst förklara först när man är hos en gemenskap som icke känner en. Det blir mindre diskussion och bättre gemenskap då. Adville (diskussion) 12. maj 2024, 12:47 (CEST)